Ans (1) It is very difficult to know director's intention behind omitting Lulu's scene.About Lulu's scene, in the last scene she is complaining about Nat's behaviour in the birthday party. Two scenes of lulu omitted from the movie because two woman characters in the play. Lulu character is always inspiration of men. That are omitted according to me the possible reason as that Stanley is protagonist of the play and central character not lulu so more focus on Stanley 'S action and reaction not unnecessary and time consuming so it's omitted and not so effect on play by omission of these scenes.
Ans (2) We find the effect of menace in the movie. So here we can find that each and every character of the play passes through unknown fear. Although there are comic scenes also, like talk between Petey and meg about newspaper news, Stanley playing drum which in beginning seems funny but suddenly it becomes frustrating and noisy. So effect of menace can be felt.
Ans. (3) I feel the lurking danger when the scene of two strangers come I'm Meg and Petey's house. And also Stanley ask same question of Meg. Stanley plays drum very aggressively, knocking on door and in birthday party when blind man's buff is going on.
Ans. (4) Generally it is daily things but in this play it is signifying something. In side the somebody is coming afraid of people most of the place or writer tries to do that in the movie releasing in the play. He knew about what happened in the society.
Ans. (5) Camera show us many things but if we observed minutely. Artists are not free in our society. They can't developed their are freely .So indirectly it is cage. It also can be interpreted that he wants so escape from the situation and angle camera shows that he is helpless.
Ans (6) Yes, it does happened in the movie, we can see unclear dialogues,ans enclosed space, etc....
Ans (7) Movie helps us in better understanding of the play ,the pauses and silence, the effect of menacing And lurking danger cannot be felt well while reading. The film creates that awful experience and makes us feel uneasy throughout the film.
Ans. (8) I agree with the second point .It's impossible to imagine a better film of Pinter's play than this sensitive, disturbing version director by William fried kin.
Ans (9) It I were director or screenplay writer so I make it more unclear and using camera tozmake different angles. But after all it is difficult to make movie on obsurd play.
Ans (10) I choose character like.....
Stanley :- Randeep Hooda
Meg. :- Juhi chawla
Petey. :- Naseeruddin Shah
Lulu. :- Isha Gupta
Goldberg :- Akshay Kumar
McCann :- John Abraham
Thank you.............
No comments:
Post a Comment